• Home
  1. Home
  2. User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush
Scientific article
OA Policy
English

User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush

ContributorsUndurraga, Manuela; Catarino, Rosa; Navarria, Isabelle Anne Laure; Ibrahim, Yasmine Lucile; Puget, Evelyne; Drevard, Isabelle; Pache, Jean-Claude; Tille, Jean-Christophe; Petignat, Patrick
Published inPloS one, vol. 12, no. 11, e0186812
Publication date2017
Abstract

To evaluate whether the endocervical brush (ECB) is better accepted by patients and health care providers for endocervical evaluation when compared to the endocervical curette (ECC), without a decrease in the quality of sampling.

Keywords
  • Adult
  • Cervix Uteri/pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Vaginal Smears/methods
  • Young Adult
Affiliation entities
Research groups
Citation (ISO format)
UNDURRAGA, Manuela et al. User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush. In: PloS one, 2017, vol. 12, n° 11, p. e0186812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186812
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic CC BY
Identifiers
Journal ISSN1932-6203
594views
258downloads

Technical informations

Creation08/01/2018 16:27:00
First validation08/01/2018 16:27:00
Update07/01/2025 14:00:49
Status update07/01/2025 14:00:49
Last indexation07/01/2025 14:00:49
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack