• Home
  1. Home
  2. User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush
Scientific article
OA Policy
English

User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush

ContributorsUndurraga, Manuela; Catarino, Rosa; Navarria, Isabelle Anne Laure; Ibrahim, Yasmine Lucile; Puget, Evelyne; Drevard, Isabelle; Pache, Jean-Claude; Tille, Jean-Christophe; Petignat, Patrick
Published inPloS one, vol. 12, no. 11, e0186812
Publication date2017
Abstract

To evaluate whether the endocervical brush (ECB) is better accepted by patients and health care providers for endocervical evaluation when compared to the endocervical curette (ECC), without a decrease in the quality of sampling.

Keywords
  • Adult
  • Cervix Uteri/pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Vaginal Smears/methods
  • Young Adult
Affiliation entities
Research groups
Citation (ISO format)
UNDURRAGA, Manuela et al. User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush. In: PloS one, 2017, vol. 12, n° 11, p. e0186812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186812
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic CC BY
Identifiers
Journal ISSN1932-6203
588views
235downloads

Technical informations

Creation01/08/2018 4:27:00 PM
First validation01/08/2018 4:27:00 PM
Update time01/07/2025 2:00:49 PM
Status update01/07/2025 2:00:49 PM
Last indexation01/07/2025 2:00:49 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack