User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush

Article Article scientifique Article User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush eng 2017 author Undurraga Malinverno Manuela Stefania 758054 author Catarino Rosa author Navarria Isabelle Anne Laure 106865 author Ibrahim Yasmine Lucile 507821 author Puget Evelyne 76662 author Drevard Isabelle author Pache Jean-Claude 513830 author Tille Jean-Christophe 87627 author Petignat Patrick 586685 e0186812 10.1371/journal.pone.0186812 29107949 1932-6203 To evaluate whether the endocervical brush (ECB) is better accepted by patients and health care providers for endocervical evaluation when compared to the endocervical curette (ECC), without a decrease in the quality of sampling. Adult Cervix Uteri/pathology Female Humans Middle Aged Vaginal Smears/methods Young Adult Dewey 616.07 Dewey 618 137 Département de pathologie et immunologie 21F 58 Département de pédiatrie, gynécologie et obstétrique 223 false 392 Groupe Pache Jean-Claude (pathologie clinique) 658 590 Prévention du cancer du col utérin 933 PLOS ONE 12 11 8493c17d-7d65-40d4-8ebe-04fa4bde8a12 Article (Published version) Public article.pdf 1371866 application/pdf CC BY openAccess Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine fondamentale / Département de pathologie et immunologie Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de pédiatrie, gynécologie et obstétrique

Title	Published in	Access level	OA Policy	Year	Views	Downloads

User perception of endocervical sampling: A randomized comparison of endocervical evaluation with the curette vs cytobrush	PLOS ONE			2017	532	213

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Puget, Evelyne