Article (Published version) (1.5 MB) - Free access
Neuroscience findings are consistent with appraisal theories of emotion; but does the brain “respect” constructionism?
|Published in||Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2012, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 163-164|
Open Access - Licence nationale Cambridge University Press
|Abstract||I reject Lindquist et al.'s implicit claim that all emotion theories other than constructionist ones subscribe to a "brain locationist" approach. The neural mechanisms underlying relevance detection, reward, attention, conceptualization, or language use are consistent with many theories of emotion, in particular componential appraisal theories. I also question the authors' claim that the meta-analysis they report provides support for the specific assumptions of constructionist theories.|
|Research group||Affective sciences|
|SCHERER, Klaus R. Neuroscience findings are consistent with appraisal theories of emotion; but does the brain “respect” constructionism?. In: Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2012, vol. 35, n° 3, p. 163-164. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11001750 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:97850|