• Home
  1. Home
  2. Brain imaging and human nutrition: which measures to use in intervention studies?
Scientific article
Review
English

Brain imaging and human nutrition: which measures to use in intervention studies?

Contributors

Sizonenko, Stéphane; Babiloni, Claudio; de Bruin, Eveline A; Isaacs, Elizabeth B; Jönsson, Lena S; Kennedy, David O; Latulippe, Marie E; Mohajeri, M Hasan; Moreines, Judith; Pietrini, Pietro; Walhovd, Kristine B; Winwood, Robert J; Sijben, John W

Published in

British journal of nutrition, vol. 110 Suppl 1, p. S1-30

Publication date

2013

Abstract

The present review describes brain imaging technologies that can be used to assess the effects of nutritional interventions in human subjects. Specifically, we summarise the biological relevance of their outcome measures, practical use and feasibility, and recommended use in short- and long-term nutritional studies. The brain imaging technologies described consist of MRI, including diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopy and functional MRI, as well as electroencephalography/magnetoencephalography, near-IR spectroscopy, positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computerised tomography. In nutritional interventions and across the lifespan, brain imaging can detect macro- and microstructural, functional, electrophysiological and metabolic changes linked to broader functional outcomes, such as cognition. Imaging markers can be considered as specific for one or several brain processes and as surrogate instrumental endpoints that may provide sensitive measures of short- and long-term effects. For the majority of imaging measures, little information is available regarding their correlation with functional endpoints in healthy subjects; therefore, imaging markers generally cannot replace clinical endpoints that reflect the overall capacity of the brain to behaviourally respond to specific situations and stimuli. The principal added value of brain imaging measures for human nutritional intervention studies is their ability to provide unique in vivo information on the working mechanism of an intervention in hypothesis-driven research. Selection of brain imaging techniques and target markers within a given technique should mainly depend on the hypothesis regarding the mechanism of action of the intervention, level (structural, metabolic or functional) and anticipated timescale of the intervention's effects, target population, availability and costs of the techniques.

Keywords

  • Biological Markers
  • Brain/physiology
  • Brain Mapping
  • Diagnostic Imaging/methods
  • Humans
  • Intervention Studies
  • Neuroimaging/methods
  • Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
  • Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
  • Research Design

UNIGE affiliation entities

UNIGE research groups

Citation (ISO format)

SIZONENKO, Stéphane et al. Brain imaging and human nutrition: which measures to use in intervention studies? In: British journal of nutrition, 2013, vol. 110 Suppl 1, p. S1–30. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513001384

Main files (1)

Article (Published version)

Identifiers

Journal ISSN

0007-1145
664views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation

06/03/2014 15:14:00

First validation

06/03/2014 15:14:00

Update

14/03/2023 21:04:13

Status update

14/03/2023 21:04:12

Last indexation

30/10/2024 16:39:43
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of Geneva
OpenAIRE Indexed & Validated