UNIGE document Scientific Article - Meta-analysis
previous document  unige:24896  next document
add to browser collection
Title

No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial

Authors
Karas, Joshua R
Uranues, Selman
Altomare, Donato F
Sokmen, Selman
Krivokapic, Zoran
Hoch, Jiri
Bartha, Ivan
Bergamaschi, Roberto
show hidden authors show all authors [1 - 41]
Published in Diseases of the Colon and Rectum. 2011, vol. 54, no. 1, p. 29-34
Abstract No randomized controlled trial has compared no rectopexy with rectopexy for external full-thickness rectal prolapse.
Keywords AdultAgedAged, 80 and overChi-Square DistributionDigestive System Surgical Procedures/methodsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRectal Prolapse/surgeryRecurrenceTreatment Outcome
Identifiers
PMID: 21160310
Full text
Article (Published version) (176 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Structures
Research group Groupe Bruno Roche (chirurgie colo-rectale) (92)
Citation
(ISO format)
KARAS, Joshua R et al. No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. In: Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 2011, vol. 54, n° 1, p. 29-34. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:24896

232 hits

0 download

Update

Deposited on : 2013-01-03

Export document
Format :
Citation style :