Scientific article
Meta-analysis
English

No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial

Published inDiseases of the colon & rectum, vol. 54, no. 1, p. 29-34
Publication date2011
Abstract

No randomized controlled trial has compared no rectopexy with rectopexy for external full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Keywords
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Rectal Prolapse/surgery
  • Recurrence
  • Treatment Outcome
Citation (ISO format)
DEMIRBAS, Serap, ROCHE, Bruno. No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. In: Diseases of the colon & rectum, 2011, vol. 54, n° 1, p. 29–34. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fb3de3
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0012-3706
634views
1downloads

Technical informations

Creation06/11/2012 16:55:00
First validation06/11/2012 16:55:00
Update14/03/2023 17:48:47
Status update14/03/2023 17:48:47
Last indexation30/10/2024 08:10:17
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack