No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial

Article Article scientifique Méta-analyse No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial eng 2011 author Demirbas Serap 552009 author Roche Bruno 134085 29-34 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fb3de3 21160310 0012-3706 No randomized controlled trial has compared no rectopexy with rectopexy for external full-thickness rectal prolapse. Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Chi-Square Distribution Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods Female Humans Male Middle Aged Prospective Studies Rectal Prolapse/surgery Recurrence Treatment Outcome Dewey 617 57 Département de chirurgie 222 false 69 Groupe Bruno Roche (chirurgie colo-rectale) 92 Diseases of the colon & rectum 54 1 bdc8a123-1b84-424a-a0e7-82157f6fde46 Article (Published version) Restricted 2011_karas_dis_colon_rectum.pdf 180032 application/pdf restrictedAccess Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de chirurgie

Title	Published in	Access level	OA Policy	Year	Views	Downloads

No rectopexy versus rectopexy following rectal mobilization for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial	Diseases of the colon & rectum			2011	635	1

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Demirbas, Serap