Article (Published version) (290 Kb) - Limited access to UNIGE
Other version: http://www.ssrn.com/abstract=2140477
Introducing Harmful Low Energy Technology Disrupts in Europe: Shouldn't We Have Considered Consumers First?
|Published in||SSRN Electronic Journal. 2012|
|Abstract||Regulations around the world are forbidding incandescence bulbs in an attempt to curb electricity consumption. However, lighting occupies a very small share in the total electricity consumption. The replacement technology, mostly fluorescent bulbs count among drawbacks a negative impact on human health and increasing issues for their ecological elimination. Consumers feel attached to the incandescent bulbs but gradually moving to low consumption bulbs. In this paper, we list the disadvantages of fluorescent bulbs and examine some consumers' relationships with light bulbs. This is to add further elements to shift the debate away from electricity savings towards ecological and health concerns.|
|Keywords||Lighting — Bulbs — Consumer's choice — Legislation — Energy policy — Public health risk|
|Research groups||ISE Pôle Economie et management|
|CATENAZZO, Giuseppe, FRAGNIERE, Emmanuel, KANALA, Roman. Introducing Harmful Low Energy Technology Disrupts in Europe: Shouldn't We Have Considered Consumers First?. In: SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2140477 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:24287|