UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:109385  next document
add to browser collection

Unconsidered Intentional Actions. An Assessment of Scaife and Webber’s ‘Consideration Hypothesis’

Published in Journal of Moral Philosophy. 2014, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 57-79
Abstract The ‘Knobe effect’ is the name given to the empirical finding that judgments about whether an action is intentional or not seems to depend on the moral valence of this action. To account for this phenomenon, Scaife and Webber have recently advanced the ‘Consideration Hypothesis’, according to which people’s ascriptions of intentionality are driven by whether they think the agent took the outcome in consideration when taking his decision. In this paper, I examine Scaife and Webber’s hypothesis and conclude that it is supported neither by the existing literature nor by their own experiments, whose results I did not replicate, and that the ‘Consideration Hypothesis’ is not the best available account of the ‘Knobe Effect’
Keywords experimental philosophyKnobe effectmoral psychologyintentional action
Full text
Article (Accepted version) (436 Kb) - public document Free access
Article (Published version) (595 Kb) - private document Private access
Research groups Thumos
Affective sciences
(ISO format)
COVA, Florian. Unconsidered Intentional Actions. An Assessment of Scaife and Webber’s ‘Consideration Hypothesis’. In: Journal of Moral Philosophy, 2014, vol. 11, n° 1, p. 57-79. doi: 10.1163/17455243-4681013 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:109385

242 hits



Deposited on : 2018-10-19

Export document
Format :
Citation style :