Article (Published version) (121 Kb) - 
Free accessOther version: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364661398012510
Highlights
More informations
Scientific Article
unige:103938 
 |
Response from Corina, Neville and Bavelier |
|
| Authors | ||
| Published in | Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1998, vol. 2, no. 12, p. 468-470 | |
| Abstract | A reply to Gregory Hickok, Ursula Bellugi, & Edward S. Klima's (1998) commentary on results from H. Neville's et al (1998) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study of native deaf & hearing signers processing American Sign Language & written English focuses on the finding of right-hemisphere (RH) activation in deaf signers. Four studies in which RH activation was observed in spoken language processing are cited, & differences between these studies' results & the Neville et al results are discussed. Hickok, Bellugi, & Klima's suggestion that RH activation was observed due to a comparison with written English processing is refuted, & possible explanations are offered for the different results obtained in Neville et al vs studies of aphasia in left-hemisphere-damaged signers. | |
| Identifiers | ||
| Note | Response to : Hickok, G., Bellugi, U. and Klima, E.S. (1998). Update Comment What's right about the neural organization of sign language? | |
| Full text |
Article (Published version) (121 Kb) - Free access Other version: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364661398012510 |
|
| Projects | National Institutes on Deafness and Communicative Disorders J.S. McDonnell Foundation | |
| Citation (ISO format) | CORINA, David, NEVILLE, Helen, BAVELIER, Daphné. Response from Corina, Neville and Bavelier. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1998, vol. 2, n° 12, p. 468-470. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01251-0 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:103938 |
257 hits 
122 downloads 
Contact an author
Update