Scientific article
English

Approach to Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Should We Use Scoring Systems?

Published inSeminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 3-10
Publication date2017
Abstract

Modern diagnostic strategies for pulmonary embolism diagnosis almost all rely on an initial assessment of the pretest probability. Clinical prediction rules are decision-making tools using combinations of easily available clinical predictors to define the probability of a disease. The assessment of the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism has an important impact on the diagnostic strategy and on therapeutic management. Clinical prediction rules provide accurate and reproducible estimates of clinical probability. They should be derived and validated following strict methodological standards. The use of clinical prediction rules should be encouraged, since their implementation in local guidelines for pulmonary embolism diagnosis has been shown to improve patients' outcomes.

Citation (ISO format)
RIGHINI, Marc Philip, GAL, Grégoire Le, BOUNAMEAUX, Henri. Approach to Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Should We Use Scoring Systems? In: Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2017, vol. 38, n° 1, p. 3–10. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597555
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
Journal ISSN1069-3424
477views
1downloads

Technical informations

Creation30/08/2017 13:45:00
First validation30/08/2017 13:45:00
Update27/01/2025 15:23:36
Status update27/01/2025 15:23:36
Last indexation27/01/2025 15:34:22
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack