UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:99387  next document
add to browser collection

Approach to Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Should We Use Scoring Systems?

Gal, Grégoire Le
Published in Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2017, vol. 38, no. 1, p. 3-10
Abstract Modern diagnostic strategies for pulmonary embolism diagnosis almost all rely on an initial assessment of the pretest probability. Clinical prediction rules are decision-making tools using combinations of easily available clinical predictors to define the probability of a disease. The assessment of the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism has an important impact on the diagnostic strategy and on therapeutic management. Clinical prediction rules provide accurate and reproducible estimates of clinical probability. They should be derived and validated following strict methodological standards. The use of clinical prediction rules should be encouraged, since their implementation in local guidelines for pulmonary embolism diagnosis has been shown to improve patients' outcomes.
PMID: 28208193
Full text
Article (Published version) (147 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Research group La maladie thromboembolique veineuse (808)
(ISO format)
RIGHINI, Marc Philip, GAL, Grégoire Le, BOUNAMEAUX, Henri. Approach to Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Should We Use Scoring Systems?. In: Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2017, vol. 38, n° 1, p. 3-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597555 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:99387

233 hits

1 download


Deposited on : 2017-11-22

Export document
Format :
Citation style :