UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:98760  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis

Authors
Serpa Neto, Ary
Hemmes, Sabrine N T
Barbas, Carmen S V
Beiderlinden, Martin
Biehl, Michelle
Binnekade, Jan M
Canet, Jaume
Fernandez-Bustamante, Ana
show hidden authors show all authors [1 - 40]
Collaboration
Published in Anesthesiology. 2015, vol. 123, no. 1, p. 66-78
Abstract Recent studies show that intraoperative mechanical ventilation using low tidal volumes (VT) can prevent postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The aim of this individual patient data meta-analysis is to evaluate the individual associations between VT size and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level and occurrence of PPC.
Keywords HumansPositive-Pressure Respiration/methods/standardsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods/standardsRespirationArtificial/methods/standardsStatistics as Topic/methodsTidal Volume/physiology
Identifiers
PMID: 25978326
Full text
Article (Published version) (929 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Structures
Research group Dysfonctions cardio-pulmonaires et cérébrales (278)
Citation
(ISO format)
SERPA NETO, Ary et al. Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. In: Anesthesiology, 2015, vol. 123, n° 1, p. 66-78. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:98760

67 hits

0 download

Update

Deposited on : 2017-11-08

Export document
Format :
Citation style :