Scientific Article
previous document  unige:98428  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Metacognition in Prospective Memory: Are Performance Predictions Accurate?

Authors
Zeintl, Melanie
Jäger, Theodor
Published in Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2011, vol. 65, no. 1, p. 19-26
Abstract This study investigated the role of metacognition in event-based prospective memory. The aim of the study was to explore the relation between an item-level prediction (judgments of learning, JOL) and actual performance. The task and JOLs allowed a differentiation of the two components of prospective memory tasks (retrospective vs. prospective). Results revealed that individuals' predictions were (moderately) accurate for delayed JOLs but not for JOLs that had to be given immediately after task encoding. Moreover, data revealed an underconfidence-with-practice effect only for the retrospective component. For the prospective component, a substantial and general level of underconfidence in individuals' prediction–performance ratios was observed. The importance of metacognitive factors for prospective memory is discussed.
Identifiers
Full text
Article (Published version) (255 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Citation
(ISO format)
SCHNITZSPAHN, Katharina et al. Metacognition in Prospective Memory: Are Performance Predictions Accurate?. In: Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2011, vol. 65, n° 1, p. 19-26. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:98428

7 hits

0 download

Update

Deposited on : 2017-11-01

Export document
Format :
Citation style :