en
Scientific article
Open access
English

A note on phrasal movement in Modern South Arabian and its consequences

ContributorsShlonsky, Urorcid
Publication date2017
Abstract

I argue that the predominance of clause-final negation and the ban on object cliticization on perfective verb stems with a subject agreement suffix in the Modern South Arabian languages (MSA) Mehri and Jibbali are both consequences of the fact that in these languages, a verbal projection rather than a verbal head is probed by T(ense) or by a higher functional head. As a result, this verbal projection moves to a position above T and a fortiori above negation. A corollary of verb-projection phrasal movement above T is that the affixal phi features of subject agreement are stranded, bereft of a suitable host. In face of this conundrum, MSA reanalyzes subject agreement as a weak pronoun that undergoes suffixation under adjacency to a verbal host, like a pronominal object suffix. This reanalysis has a price, however, in that only a single suffix is possible on a single host, since only one suffix is adjacent to it. Hence, object pronouns cannot occur as clitics on a verb with a weak pronominal subject suffix.

Keywords
  • Mehri
  • Jibbali
  • Phrasal movement
  • Clause-final negation
  • Agreement suffixes
Citation (ISO format)
SHLONSKY, Ur. A note on phrasal movement in Modern South Arabian and its consequences. In: Brill’s annual of Afroasiatic languages and linguistics, 2017, vol. 9, p. 247–267. doi: 10.1163/18776930-00901005
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal1876-6633
680views
458downloads

Technical informations

Creation05/03/2017 11:58:00 AM
First validation05/03/2017 11:58:00 AM
Update time03/15/2023 1:39:02 AM
Status update03/15/2023 1:39:01 AM
Last indexation01/16/2024 11:52:54 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack