UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:90795  next document
add to browser collection

Guided (VENTRI-GUIDE) versus freehand ventriculostomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Smoll, Nicolas
Published in Trials. 2014, vol. 15, 478
Abstract Despite the widespread use of external ventricular drainage, revision rates, and associated complications are reported between 10 and 40%. Current available image-guided techniques using stereotaxy, endoscopy, or ultrasound for catheter placements remain time-consuming techniques. Recently, a smartphone-assisted guide with high precision has been described. The development of an easy-to-use, portable, image-guided system could reduce the need for multiple passes and improve the rate of accurate catheter placement. This study aims to prospectively compare in a randomized controlled manner the accuracy of the freehand pass technique versus an easy-to-use, portable, adjustable guiding device for ventriculostomy catheter placement.
Keywords Anatomic LandmarksCatheterization/adverse effects/instrumentation/methodsCathetersClinical ProtocolsComputers, HandheldFemaleHumansMaleMobile ApplicationsNeuronavigation/adverse effects/instrumentation/methodsProspective StudiesRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedResearch DesignSoftware DesignSwitzerlandTomography, X-Ray Computed/instrumentationTreatment OutcomeVentriculostomy/adverse effects/instrumentation/methods
PMID: 25480528
Full text
Article (Published version) (616 Kb) - public document Free access
Research group Groupe Schaller Karl Lothard (neurochirurgie) (851)
(ISO format)
SARRAFZADEH-KHORASSANI, Asita Simone, SMOLL, Nicolas, SCHALLER, Karl Lothard. Guided (VENTRI-GUIDE) versus freehand ventriculostomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. In: Trials, 2014, vol. 15, p. 478. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-478 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:90795

362 hits



Deposited on : 2017-01-04

Export document
Format :
Citation style :