Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial

Published inCritical care, vol. 19, 91
Publication date2015
Abstract

A systemic anticoagulation is often required to prevent circuit and filter clotting in ICU patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). A regional citrate-based anticoagulation (RCA) does not induce a systemic anticoagulation and prolongs the filter lifespan, but metabolic side-effects have been associated with this therapy. We conducted a randomized controlled trial with patients requiring CRRT to determine whether RCA using a balanced predilution replacement fluid is more effective than heparin in terms of renal replacement delivered dose and safety profile.

Keywords
  • Acute Kidney Injury/drug therapy
  • Aged
  • Anticoagulants/therapeutic use
  • Blood Coagulation
  • Citrates/therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Filtration
  • Heparin/therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Renal Replacement Therapy/methods
  • Survival Rate
Citation (ISO format)
STUCKER, Fabien Jérôme et al. Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. In: Critical care, 2015, vol. 19, p. 91. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0822-z
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
Journal ISSN1364-8535
628views
436downloads

Technical informations

Creation24/11/2016 13:14:00
First validation24/11/2016 13:14:00
Update15/03/2023 01:02:13
Status update15/03/2023 01:02:13
Last indexation31/10/2024 05:18:16
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack