en
Scientific article
Open access
English

How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors

Published inBMJ open, vol. 6, no. 3, e010442
Publication date2016
Abstract

To study whether systematic reviewers apply procedures to counter-balance some common forms of research malpractice such as not publishing completed research, duplicate publications, or selective reporting of outcomes, and to see whether they identify and report misconduct.

Keywords
  • Systematic review
  • Research misconduct
Citation (ISO format)
ELIA, Nadia et al. How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors. In: BMJ open, 2016, vol. 6, n° 3, p. e010442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010442
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal2044-6055
564views
262downloads

Technical informations

Creation08/28/2016 6:03:00 PM
First validation08/28/2016 6:03:00 PM
Update time06/06/2023 9:19:23 AM
Status update03/15/2023 12:42:19 AM
Last indexation01/16/2024 9:41:28 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack