

![]() |
How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors |
|
Authors | ||
Published in | BMJ open. 2016, vol. 6, no. 3, e010442 | |
Abstract | To study whether systematic reviewers apply procedures to counter-balance some common forms of research malpractice such as not publishing completed research, duplicate publications, or selective reporting of outcomes, and to see whether they identify and report misconduct. | |
Keywords | Systematic review — Research misconduct | |
Identifiers | PMID: 26936908 | |
Full text | ||
Structures | ||
Research group | La médecine périopératoire et l'anesthésie (70) | |
Citation (ISO format) | ELIA, Nadia et al. How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors. In: BMJ Open, 2016, vol. 6, n° 3, p. e010442. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010442 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:86858 |