UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:86858  next document
add to browser collection
Title

How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors
Authors
Elia, Nadia
Von Elm, Erik Bjorn
Chatagner, Alexandra
Pöpping, Daniel M
Tramer, Martin
Published in BMJ Open. 2016, vol. 6, no. 3, p. e010442
Abstract To study whether systematic reviewers apply procedures to counter-balance some common forms of research malpractice such as not publishing completed research, duplicate publications, or selective reporting of outcomes, and to see whether they identify and report misconduct.
Keywords Systematic review — Research misconduct
Identifiers
PMID: 26936908
Full text
Article (Published version) (1.1 MB) - public document Free access
Structures
Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de santé et médecine communautaires / Institut de santé globale
Research group La médecine périopératoire et l'anesthésie (70)
Citation
(ISO format) 		ELIA, Nadia et al. How do authors of systematic reviews deal with research malpractice and misconduct in original studies? A cross-sectional analysis of systematic reviews and survey of their authors. In: BMJ Open, 2016, vol. 6, n° 3, p. e010442. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:86858

210 hits

71 downloads

Contact an author

Update request

Update

Deposited on : 2016-09-07

Export document
Format :
Citation style :