Professional article
Open access

The development of a descriptive evaluation tool for clinical ethics case consultations

Published inClinical ethics, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 136-141
Publication date2010

There is growing interest in clinical ethics. However, we still have sparse knowledge about what is actually going on in the everyday practice of clinical ethics consultations. This paper introduces a descriptive evaluation tool to present, discuss and compare how clinical ethics case consultations are actually carried out. The tool does not aim to define ‘best practice'. Rather, it facilitates concrete comparisons and evaluative discussions of the role, function, procedures and ideals inherent in clinical ethics case consultation practices. The tool was developed during meetings of the European Clinical Ethics Network. Based on written reports and participation in the network meetings, the development and the content of the tool and the results of its application in presenting and discussing 10 case consultations are summarized. The tool facilitated understanding of the details of clinical ethics case consultations across individuals and institutions with various experiences and cultures, and comparison between various practices.

Citation (ISO format)
PEDERSEN, Reidar et al. The development of a descriptive evaluation tool for clinical ethics case consultations. In: Clinical ethics, 2010, vol. 5, n° 3, p. 136–141. doi: 10.1258/ce.2010.010025
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
ISSN of the journal1477-7509

Technical informations

Creation06/24/2016 8:45:00 PM
First validation06/24/2016 8:45:00 PM
Update time03/15/2023 12:33:16 AM
Status update03/15/2023 12:33:15 AM
Last indexation01/16/2024 9:18:31 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack