UNIGE document Preprint
previous document  unige:80476  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Democracy, Epistemology and the Problem of All-White Juries

Author
Submitted to Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2015
Abstract ABSTRACT Does it matter that almost all juries in England and Wales are all-White? Does it matter, even if this result is the unintended and undesired result of otherwise acceptable ways of choosing juries? Finally, does it matter that almost all juries are all-White if this has no adverse effect on the treatment of non-White defendants and victims of crime? According to Cheryl Thomas, there is no injustice in a system of jury selection, which predictably results in juries with no minority members, so long as this result is not deliberate and does not adversely affect the treatment of minority defendants and victims of crime. My view is different. In and of itself, I believe, something is wrong with a system of jury selection that predictably results in all-White juries in a diverse society, such as our own. Absent reason to believe that we lack a better alternative to current modes of jury selection, a commitment to democratic government and to the equality of citizens – or so I will argue – condemns existing arrangements as unjust, whether or not they have adverse effects on jury decisions, or on the ways in which our society approaches issues of race and crime.
Keywords JuriesDemocracyEqualityRaceRepresentationParticipationAccountability'the face of justice'
Full text
Article (Preprint) (262 Kb) - public document Free access
Structures
Citation
(ISO format)
LEVER, Annabelle. Democracy, Epistemology and the Problem of All-White Juries. Submitted to: Journal of Applied Philosophy, 2015. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:80476

244 hits

49 downloads

Update

Deposited on : 2016-02-05

Export document
Format :
Citation style :