Article (Published version) (397 Kb) - Limited access to UNIGE
Cost-consequence analysis of daily continuous remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillator and resynchronization devices in the UK.
|Published in||Europace. 2013, vol. 15, no. 11, p. 1601-8|
|Abstract||The need for ongoing and lifelong follow-up (FU) of patients with cardiac implantable electric devices (CIED) requires significant resources. Remote CIED management has been established as a safe alternative to conventional periodical in-office FU (CFU). An economic model compares the long-term cost and consequences of using daily Home Monitoring® (HM) instead of CFU.|
|Keywords||Aged — Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices/economics — Costs and Cost Analysis — Defibrillators, Implantable/economics — Female — Great Britain/epidemiology — Heart Failure/economics/epidemiology/therapy — Humans — Male — Markov Chains — Models, Economic — Monitoring, Ambulatory/economics/instrumentation — Monitoring, Physiologic/economics/instrumentation — Office Visits/economics — State Medicine — Telemedicine/economics/instrumentation|
|BURRI, Haran Kumar et al. Cost-consequence analysis of daily continuous remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillator and resynchronization devices in the UK. In: Europace, 2013, vol. 15, n° 11, p. 1601-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut070 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:77505|