UNIGE document Scientific Article - Editorial
previous document  unige:77420  next document
add to browser collection

Chloracne, a Misnomer and Its Implications

Published in Dermatology. 2010, vol. 221, no. 1, p. 23-26
Abstract In this isssue Passarini et al report on an outbreak of so called “chloracne” in Italy [1]. This article importantly reminds us of the many issues that relate to human dermatotoxicology in general, and dioxin exposure in particular. The skin is a key organ for the recognition of exposure to several poisons, and more specifically those related to the dioxin group. Such a “sentinel” role for the skin is most probably related to the fact that many poisons, be introduced either through the skin or systemically, are metabolised in the skin, and therein induce symptoms that may be specific for that poison. It was through the thoughfull clinical and histological analysis of the Italian group from the dermatology department of Bologna that a diagnosis of “chloracne” was made in several patients having been intoxicated in a holiday resort . For such a diagnosis, high clinical suspicion and specific laboratory markers are necessary, since important ecotoxicology issues may be involved. So how robust is the diagnosis of “chloracne” in this case series from Passarini et al. (1) and where are the guidelines for the minimum mandatory criteria for such a diagnosis?
Keywords DioxinToxicologySkinChloracne
Full text
Article (Published version) (209 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Other version: http://www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000290672
Research group La recherche en biochimie dermatologique (652)
(ISO format)
SAURAT, Jean-Hilaire, SORG, Olivier. Chloracne, a Misnomer and Its Implications. In: Dermatology, 2010, vol. 221, n° 1, p. 23-26. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:77420

143 hits

0 download


Deposited on : 2015-11-18

Export document
Format :
Citation style :