Professional article
Open access

Can there ever be too many options? A meta‐analytic review of choice overload

Published inJournal of consumer research, vol. 37, no. 3, p. 409-425
Publication date2010

The choice overload hypothesis states that an increase in the number of options to choose from may lead to adverse consequences such as a decrease in the motivation to choose or the satisfaction with the finally chosen option. A number of studies found strong instances of choice overload in the lab and in the field, but others found no such effects or found that more choices may instead facilitate choice and increase satisfaction. In a meta‐analysis of 63 conditions from 50 published and unpublished experiments (N = 5,036), we found a mean effect size of virtually zero but considerable variance between studies. While further analyses indicated several potentially important preconditions for choice overload, no sufficient conditions could be identified. However, some idiosyncratic moderators proposed in single studies may still explain when and why choice overload reliably occurs; we review these studies and identify possible directions for future research.

Citation (ISO format)
SCHEIBEHENNE, Benjamin, TODD, Peter M., GREIFENEDER, Rainer. Can there ever be too many options? A meta‐analytic review of choice overload. In: Journal of consumer research, 2010, vol. 37, n° 3, p. 409–425. doi: 10.1086/651235
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (1)
ISSN of the journal0093-5301

Technical informations

Creation10/13/2015 11:01:00 PM
First validation10/13/2015 11:01:00 PM
Update time03/14/2023 11:45:10 PM
Status update03/14/2023 11:45:09 PM
Last indexation10/18/2023 11:58:01 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack