Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

Redolfi, Alberto; Manset, David; Barkhof, Frederik; Wahlund, Lars-Olof; Glatard, Tristan; Mangin, Jean-François; Frisoni, Giovanni

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117692

Scientific article

Open access

English

Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

ContributorsRedolfi, Alberto; Manset, David; Barkhof, Frederik; Wahlund, Lars-Olof; Glatard, Tristan; Mangin, Jean-François; Frisoni, Giovanni

Published inPloS one, vol. 10, no. 3, e0117692

Publication date2015

Abstract

The measurement of cortical shrinkage is a candidate marker of disease progression in Alzheimer's. This study evaluated the performance of two pipelines: Civet-CLASP (v1.1.9) and Freesurfer (v5.3.0).

Affiliation

Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de psychiatrie

Research group

Troubles de mémoire et maladie d'Alzeimer (935)

Citation (ISO format)

REDOLFI, Alberto et al. Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study. In: PloS one, 2015, vol. 10, n° 3, p. e0117692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117692

Article (Published version)

CC BY

Identifiers

PID : unige:75889
DOI : 10.1371/journal.pone.0117692
PMID : 25781983

ISSN of the journal1932-6203

467views

186downloads

Creation08/25/2015 3:13:00 PM

First validation08/25/2015 3:13:00 PM

Update time03/14/2023 11:41:03 PM

Status update03/14/2023 11:41:03 PM

Last indexation08/29/2023 7:20:03 PM

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Head-to-head comparison of two popular cortical thickness extraction algorithms: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

The measurement of cortical shrinkage is a candidate marker of disease progression in Alzheimer's. This study evaluated the performance of two pipelines: Civet-CLASP (v1.1.9) and Freesurfer (v5.3.0).

Technical informations