Proceedings chapter (Published version) (209 Kb) - Free access
Proceedings chapter (Accepted version) (140 Kb) - Free access
Other version: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c9537.pdf
Globalization and Dirty Industries: Do Pollution Havens Matter?
|Published in||Baldwin, R.-E. & Winters, L.-A. Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics. Stockholm (Sweden) - 24-25 May 2002 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2004, p. 167-205|
|Abstract||This paper reviews arguments and evidence on the impact of globalization on the environment, then presents evidence on production and international trade flows in five heavily polluting industries for 52 countries over the period 1981-98. A new decomposition of revealed comparative advantage (RCA) according to geographical origin reveals a delocalization to the South for all heavily polluting industries except non-ferrous metals that exhibits South-North delocalization in accordance with factor-abundance driven response to a reduction in trade barriers. Panel estimation of a gravity model of bilateral trade on the same data set reveals that, on average, polluting industries have higher barriers-to-trade costs (except non-ferrous metals with significantly lower barriers to trade) and little evidence of delocalization in response to a North-South regulatory gap.|
|Keywords||Trade and the environment — Revealed comparative advantage — Gravity model|
|DE MELO, Jaime, GRETHER, Jean-Marie. Globalization and Dirty Industries: Do Pollution Havens Matter?. In: Baldwin, R.-E. & Winters, L.-A. (Ed.). Challenges to Globalization: Analyzing the Economics. Stockholm (Sweden). Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 2004. p. 167-205. doi: 10.3386/w9776 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:55390|