Portal versus systemic drainage of small bowel allografts: comparative assessment of survival, function, rejection, and bacterial translocation

Berney, Thierry; Kato, Tomoaki; Nishida, Seigo; Tector, A Joseph; Mittal, Naveen K; Madariaga, Juan; Nery, Jose R; Cantwell, G Patricia; Ruiz, Philip; Tzakis, Andreas G

doi:10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01482-5

Scientific article

English

Portal versus systemic drainage of small bowel allografts: comparative assessment of survival, function, rejection, and bacterial translocation

ContributorsBerney, Thierry; Kato, Tomoaki; Nishida, Seigo; Tector, A Joseph; Mittal, Naveen K; Madariaga, Juan; Nery, Jose R; Cantwell, G Patricia; Ruiz, Philip; Tzakis, Andreas G

Published inJournal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 195, no. 6, p. 804-813

Publication date2002

Abstract

Portal venous drainage of small bowel grafts is theoretically more physiologic than systemic drainage, but is technically more demanding. Comparisons in animal models have not demonstrated a clear advantage of one technique over the other, but clinical data are lacking.

Keywords

Actuarial Analysis
Adolescent
Adult
Analysis of Variance
Bacterial Infections/microbiology
Bacterial Translocation
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Graft Rejection
Graft Survival
Humans
Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
Intestine, Small/blood supply/transplantation
Liver Function Tests
Male
Portal Vein
Retrospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric

Affiliation entities

Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de chirurgie

Research groups

La transplantation d'îlots de Langerhans (623)

Citation (ISO format)

BERNEY, Thierry et al. Portal versus systemic drainage of small bowel allografts: comparative assessment of survival, function, rejection, and bacterial translocation. In: Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002, vol. 195, n° 6, p. 804–813. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01482-5

Article (Published version)

Identifiers

PID : unige:45720
DOI : 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01482-5
PMID : 12495313

Journal ISSN1072-7515

571views

0downloads

Creation20/01/2015 16:01:00

First validation20/01/2015 16:01:00

Update14/03/2023 22:44:29

Status update14/03/2023 22:44:28

Last indexation30/10/2024 22:26:34

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Portal versus systemic drainage of small bowel allografts: comparative assessment of survival, function, rejection, and bacterial translocation

Portal venous drainage of small bowel grafts is theoretically more physiologic than systemic drainage, but is technically more demanding. Comparisons in animal models have not demonstrated a clear advantage of one technique over the other, but clinical data are lacking.

Technical informations