en
Scientific article
Review
Open access
English

Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection

Published inBMJ. British medical journal, vol. 348, g5219
Publication date2014
Abstract

To examine whether, according to the conclusions of a 2000 systematic review with meta-analysis on interventions to prevent pain from propofol injection that provided a research agenda to guide further research on the topic, subsequently published trials were more often optimally blinded, reported on children, and used the most efficacious intervention as comparator; and to check whether the number of new trials published each year had decreased and whether the designs of trials that cited the review differed from those that did not.

Keywords
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous/adverse effects
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Pain/etiology/prevention & control
  • Propofol/administration & dosage
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards
  • Research Design/standards
  • Review Literature as Topic
Citation (ISO format)
HABRE, Céline et al. Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection. In: BMJ. British medical journal, 2014, vol. 348, p. g5219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5219
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal0959-8138
611views
198downloads

Technical informations

Creation12/11/2014 7:48:00 PM
First validation12/11/2014 7:48:00 PM
Update time03/14/2023 10:25:31 PM
Status update03/14/2023 10:25:31 PM
Last indexation01/16/2024 3:07:07 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack