UNIGE document Scientific Article - Review
previous document  unige:43182  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection
Authors
Habre, Céline
Tramer, Martin
Pöpping, Daniel
Elia, Nadia
Published in BMJ. British medical journal. 2014, vol. 348, g5219
Abstract To examine whether, according to the conclusions of a 2000 systematic review with meta-analysis on interventions to prevent pain from propofol injection that provided a research agenda to guide further research on the topic, subsequently published trials were more often optimally blinded, reported on children, and used the most efficacious intervention as comparator; and to check whether the number of new trials published each year had decreased and whether the designs of trials that cited the review differed from those that did not.
Keywords Humans — Injections, Intravenous/adverse effects — Meta-Analysis as Topic — Pain/etiology/prevention & control — Propofol/administration & dosage — Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards — Research Design/standards — Review Literature as Topic
Identifiers
PMID: 25161280
Full text
Article (Published version) (1.5 MB) - public document Free access
Structures
Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département d'anesthésiologie, pharmacologie, soins intensifs et urgences
Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de santé et médecine communautaires / Institut de santé globale
Research group La Médecine Périopératoire et l'anesthésie (70)
Citation
(ISO format) 		HABRE, Céline et al. Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection. In: BMJ. British medical journal, 2014, vol. 348, p. g5219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5219 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:43182

577 hits

192 downloads

Contact an author

Update request

Update

Deposited on : 2014-12-12

Export document
Format :
Citation style :