Scientific article
Review
OA Policy
English

Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection

Published inBMJ. British medical journal, vol. 348, g5219
Publication date2014
Abstract

To examine whether, according to the conclusions of a 2000 systematic review with meta-analysis on interventions to prevent pain from propofol injection that provided a research agenda to guide further research on the topic, subsequently published trials were more often optimally blinded, reported on children, and used the most efficacious intervention as comparator; and to check whether the number of new trials published each year had decreased and whether the designs of trials that cited the review differed from those that did not.

Keywords
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous/adverse effects
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Pain/etiology/prevention & control
  • Propofol/administration & dosage
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards
  • Research Design/standards
  • Review Literature as Topic
Citation (ISO format)
HABRE, Céline et al. Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection. In: BMJ. British medical journal, 2014, vol. 348, p. g5219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5219
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0959-8138
703views
320downloads

Technical informations

Creation11/12/2014 19:48:00
First validation11/12/2014 19:48:00
Update14/03/2023 22:25:31
Status update14/03/2023 22:25:31
Last indexation29/09/2025 14:17:35
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack