fr
Article scientifique
Revue de la littérature
Accès libre
Anglais

Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection

Publié dansBMJ. British medical journal, vol. 348, g5219
Date de publication2014
Résumé

To examine whether, according to the conclusions of a 2000 systematic review with meta-analysis on interventions to prevent pain from propofol injection that provided a research agenda to guide further research on the topic, subsequently published trials were more often optimally blinded, reported on children, and used the most efficacious intervention as comparator; and to check whether the number of new trials published each year had decreased and whether the designs of trials that cited the review differed from those that did not.

Mots-clés
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous/adverse effects
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic
  • Pain/etiology/prevention & control
  • Propofol/administration & dosage
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards
  • Research Design/standards
  • Review Literature as Topic
Citation (format ISO)
HABRE, Céline et al. Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection. In: BMJ. British medical journal, 2014, vol. 348, p. g5219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5219
Fichiers principaux (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelPublic
Identifiants
ISSN du journal0959-8138
612vues
198téléchargements

Informations techniques

Création11/12/2014 19:48:00
Première validation11/12/2014 19:48:00
Heure de mise à jour14/03/2023 22:25:31
Changement de statut14/03/2023 22:25:31
Dernière indexation16/01/2024 15:07:07
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack