UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:40103  next document
add to browser collection

Privacy and Democracy: A Response to James Rule

Published in Journal of Law, Culture and the Humanities. 2014, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 188-99
Abstract James Rule is puzzled by the ‘idiosyncratic’ approach that I take to the philosophical study of privacy. As evidence for this idiosyncracy, he cites my relative indifference to the distinction between consequentialist and deontological perspectives on privacy although these differences are proof of ‘intricate, yet enormously consequential intellectual tensions’. My choice of philosophical topics is ‘unsystematic’ and more a reflection of my own ‘intellectual hobby-horses’ than a ‘well-worked-out view of what students most need to know’. Finally, Rule concludes, because ‘the most important privacy questions are excruciating’, we need ‘more systematic guidance than is provided here’. I am grateful to the editors for the chance to respond to these complaints.
Keywords PrivacyEqualityDemocracyJames RuleDeontologyConsequentialismMethodEthics
Full text
Article (Accepted version) (108 Kb) - public document Free access
(ISO format)
LEVER, Annabelle. Privacy and Democracy: A Response to James Rule. In: Journal of Law, Culture and the Humanities, 2014, vol. 10, n° 1, p. 188-99. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:40103

1027 hits



Deposited on : 2014-09-10

Export document
Format :
Citation style :