Article (Published version) (256 Kb) - 
Limited access to UNIGE
Highlights
More informations
Scientific Article - Review
unige:39317 
 |
The Therapy of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review |
|
| Authors | ||
| Published in | International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2014, vol. 29 suppl, p. 325-345 | |
| Abstract | Purpose: To evaluate the success of treatments aimed at the resolution of peri-implantitis in patients with osseointegrated implants. Materials and Methods: The potentially relevant literature was assessed independently by two reviewers to identify case series and comparative studies describing the treatment of peri-implantitis with a follow-up of at least 3 months. Medline, Embase, and The Cochrane Library were searched. For the purposes of this review, a composite criterion for successful treatment outcome was used which comprised implant survival with mean probing depth < 5 mm and no further bone loss. Results: A total of 43 publications were included: 4 papers describing 3 nonsurgical case series, 13 papers describing 10 comparative studies of nonsurgical interventions, 15 papers describing 14 surgical case series, and 11 papers describing 6 comparative studies of surgical interventions. No trials comparing nonsurgical with surgical interventions were found. The length of follow-up varied from 3 months to 7.5 years. Due to the heterogeneity of study designs, peri-implantitis case definitions, outcome variables, and reporting, no meta- analysis was performed. Eleven studies could be evaluated according to a composite success criterion. Successful treatment outcomes at 12 months were reported in 0% to 100% of patients treated in 9 studies and in 75% to 93% of implants treated in 2 studies. Commonalities in treatment approaches between studies included (1) a pretreatment phase, (2) cause-related therapy, and (3) a maintenance care phase. Conclusions: While the available evidence does not allow any specific recommendations for the therapy of peri-implantitis, successful treatment outcomes at 12 months were reported in a majority of patients in 7 studies. Although favorable short-term outcomes were reported in many studies, lack of disease resolution as well as progression or recurrence of disease and implant loss despite treatment were also reported. The reported outcomes must be viewed in the context of the varied peri-implantitis case definitions and severity of disease included as well as the heterogeneity in study design, length of follow-up, and exclusion/inclusion criteria. Int J Oral MaxIllOfac IMplants 2014;29(suppl):325–345. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2014suppl.g5.3 | |
| Keywords | Peri-implantitis — Systematic review — Treatment — Therapy | |
| Full text | ||
| Structures | ||
| Research group | Groupe Mombelli Andréa (médecine dentaire) (242) | |
| Citation (ISO format) | HEITZ-MAYFIELD, Lisa J.A., MOMBELLI, Andrea. The Therapy of Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review. In: International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2014, vol. 29 suppl, p. 325-345. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:39317 |
404 hits 
0 download 
Contact an author
Update