en
Scientific article
Meta-analysis
English

Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device

Published inBritish journal of surgery, vol. 101, no. 2, p. 8-16
Publication date2014
Abstract

Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) are commonly used in patients with cancer. Although several methods of implantation have been described, there is not enough evidence to support the use of a specific technique on a daily basis. The objective of this study was systematically to assess the literature comparing percutaneous subclavian vein puncture with surgical venous cutdown.

Keywords
  • Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects/methods
  • Catheters, Indwelling
  • Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects/methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Subclavian Vein/surgery
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Venous Cutdown/adverse effects/methods
Citation (ISO format)
ORCI, Lorenzo et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device. In: British journal of surgery, 2014, vol. 101, n° 2, p. 8–16. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9276
Main files (1)
Article (Accepted version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal0007-1323
751views
2downloads

Technical informations

Creation08/04/2014 3:39:00 PM
First validation08/04/2014 3:39:00 PM
Update time03/14/2023 9:30:28 PM
Status update03/14/2023 9:30:28 PM
Last indexation01/16/2024 11:31:11 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack