UNIGE document Scientific Article - Meta-analysis
previous document  unige:39215  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device
Authors
Orci, Lorenzo
Meier, Raphaël
Morel, Philippe
Staszewicz, Wojciech
Toso, Christian
Published in British Journal of Surgery. 2014, vol. 101, no. 2, p. 8-16
Abstract Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) are commonly used in patients with cancer. Although several methods of implantation have been described, there is not enough evidence to support the use of a specific technique on a daily basis. The objective of this study was systematically to assess the literature comparing percutaneous subclavian vein puncture with surgical venous cutdown.
Keywords Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects/methods — Catheters, Indwelling — Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects/methods — Female — Humans — Male — Middle Aged — Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic — Subclavian Vein/surgery — Treatment Outcome — Venous Cutdown/adverse effects/methods
Identifiers
PMID: 24276950
Full text
Article (Accepted version) (175 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Structures
Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de chirurgie
Research groups Transplantation et hépatologie (905)
Chirurgie viscérale (104)
Chirurgie viscérale (HUG)
Citation
(ISO format) 		ORCI, Lorenzo et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous subclavian vein puncture versus surgical venous cutdown for the insertion of a totally implantable venous access device. In: British Journal of Surgery, 2014, vol. 101, n° 2, p. 8-16. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9276 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:39215

560 hits

2 downloads

Contact an author

Update request

Update

Deposited on : 2014-08-06

Export document
Format :
Citation style :