Article (Published version) (165 Kb) - 
Limited access to UNIGEOther version: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/ASO.2003.07.024
Highlights
Scientific Article
unige:37176 
 |
Hepatic resection for metastatic renal tumors: is it worthwhile? |
|
| Authors | ||
| Published in | Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2003, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 705-10 | |
| Abstract | Liver metastases of malignant renal tumors are regarded as having an ominous prognosis because they are infrequently amenable to radical surgery and respond poorly to chemotherapy. Little is known of the outcome of isolated metastases to the liver for which resection is potentially curative. | |
| Keywords | Adult — Aged — Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary/surgery — Disease-Free Survival — Female — Humans — Kidney Neoplasms/pathology/surgery — Liver Neoplasms/secondary/surgery — Male — Middle Aged — Nephrectomy — Prognosis — Retrospective Studies — Sarcoma/secondary/surgery — Wilms Tumor/secondary/surgery | |
| Identifiers | PMID: 12839857 | |
| Full text |
Article (Published version) (165 Kb) - Limited access to UNIGE Other version: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/ASO.2003.07.024 |
|
| Structures | ||
| Research group | Hépatologie chirurgicale (327) | |
| Citation (ISO format) | ALVES, A et al. Hepatic resection for metastatic renal tumors: is it worthwhile?. In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2003, vol. 10, n° 6, p. 705-10. doi: 10.1245/aso.2003.07.024 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:37176 |
562 hits 
0 download 
Contact an author
Update