Scientific article
English

Hepatic resection for metastatic renal tumors: is it worthwhile?

Published inAnnals of surgical oncology, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 705-710
Publication date2003
Abstract

Liver metastases of malignant renal tumors are regarded as having an ominous prognosis because they are infrequently amenable to radical surgery and respond poorly to chemotherapy. Little is known of the outcome of isolated metastases to the liver for which resection is potentially curative.

Keywords
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary/surgery
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kidney Neoplasms/pathology/surgery
  • Liver Neoplasms/secondary/surgery
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrectomy
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sarcoma/secondary/surgery
  • Wilms Tumor/secondary/surgery
Citation (ISO format)
ALVES, A et al. Hepatic resection for metastatic renal tumors: is it worthwhile? In: Annals of surgical oncology, 2003, vol. 10, n° 6, p. 705–710. doi: 10.1245/aso.2003.07.024
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
Journal ISSN1068-9265
700views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation03/06/2014 14:37:00
First validation03/06/2014 14:37:00
Update14/03/2023 21:17:47
Status update14/03/2023 21:17:47
Last indexation30/10/2024 17:28:58
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack