Article (Published version) (165 Kb) - Limited access to UNIGE
Other version: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1245/ASO.2003.07.024
Hepatic resection for metastatic renal tumors: is it worthwhile?
|Published in||Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2003, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 705-10|
|Abstract||Liver metastases of malignant renal tumors are regarded as having an ominous prognosis because they are infrequently amenable to radical surgery and respond poorly to chemotherapy. Little is known of the outcome of isolated metastases to the liver for which resection is potentially curative.|
|Keywords||Adult — Aged — Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary/surgery — Disease-Free Survival — Female — Humans — Kidney Neoplasms/pathology/surgery — Liver Neoplasms/secondary/surgery — Male — Middle Aged — Nephrectomy — Prognosis — Retrospective Studies — Sarcoma/secondary/surgery — Wilms Tumor/secondary/surgery|
|Research group||Hépatologie chirurgicale (327)|
|ALVES, A et al. Hepatic resection for metastatic renal tumors: is it worthwhile?. In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2003, vol. 10, n° 6, p. 705-10. doi: 10.1245/aso.2003.07.024 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:37176|