en
Scientific article
English

Citation analysis of identical consensus statements revealed journal-related bias

ContributorsPerneger, Thomas
Published inJournal of clinical epidemiology, vol. 63, no. 6, p. 660-664
Publication date2010
Abstract

To examine whether the prestige of a journal, measured by its impact factor, influences the numbers of citations obtained by published articles, independently of their scientific merit.

Keywords
  • Cohort Studies
  • Consensus
  • Humans
  • Journal Impact Factor
  • Periodicals as Topic/standards
  • Publication Bias/statistics & numerical data
  • Quality Control
Citation (ISO format)
PERNEGER, Thomas. Citation analysis of identical consensus statements revealed journal-related bias. In: Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2010, vol. 63, n° 6, p. 660–664. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.012
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal0895-4356
576views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation11/28/2013 6:01:00 PM
First validation11/28/2013 6:01:00 PM
Update time03/14/2023 8:46:08 PM
Status update03/14/2023 8:46:08 PM
Last indexation01/16/2024 8:39:05 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack