The utility of comparing "like with like" in small randomized controlled trials: is this acceptable according to the rules of evidence-based medicine?

Rimensberger, Peter

doi:10.1097/PCC.0b013e31822314ca

Scientific article

English

The utility of comparing "like with like" in small randomized controlled trials: is this acceptable according to the rules of evidence-based medicine?

ContributorsRimensberger, Peter

Published inPediatric critical care medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 104-106

Publication date2012

Keywords

Female
High-Frequency Ventilation/methods
Humans
Infant, Premature
Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
Male
Pregnancy
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/therapy

Affiliation entities

Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de pédiatrie, gynécologie et obstétrique

Research groups

Maladies pulmonaires aigues et pathologies cardiaques congénitales (697)

Citation (ISO format)

RIMENSBERGER, Peter. The utility of comparing ‘like with like’ in small randomized controlled trials: is this acceptable according to the rules of evidence-based medicine? In: Pediatric critical care medicine, 2012, vol. 13, n° 1, p. 104–106. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31822314ca

Article (Published version)

Identifiers

PID : unige:30600
DOI : 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31822314ca
PMID : 22222650

Journal ISSN1529-7535

573views

1downloads

Creation17/10/2013 13:04:00

First validation17/10/2013 13:04:00

Update14/03/2023 20:34:11

Status update14/03/2023 20:34:11

Last indexation30/10/2024 14:45:07

Archive ouverte UNIGE

The utility of comparing "like with like" in small randomized controlled trials: is this acceptable according to the rules of evidence-based medicine?

Technical informations