Article (Published version) (41 Kb) - Limited access to UNIGE
The Mere Exposure Effect and Recognition Depend on the Way You Look!
|Published in||Experimental Psychology. 2010, vol. 57, no. 3, p. 185-192|
|Abstract||In line with Whittlesea and Price (2001), we investigated whether the memory effect measured with an implicit memory paradigm (mere exposure effect) and an explicit recognition task depended on perceptual processing strategies, regardless of whether the task required intentional retrieval. We found that manipulation intended to prompt functional implicit-explicit dissociation no longer had a differential effect when we induced similar perceptual strategies in both tasks. Indeed, the results showed that prompting a nonanalytic strategy ensured performance above chance on both tasks. Conversely, inducing an analytic strategy drastically decreased both explicit and implicit performance. Furthermore, we noted that the nonanalytic strategy involved less extensive gaze scanning than the analytic strategy and that memory effects under this processing strategy were largely independent of gaze movement.|
|Keywords||Analysis of Variance — Attention/physiology — Choice Behavior/physiology — Eye Movements — Female — Humans — Judgment/physiology — Male — Orientation/physiology — Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology — Photic Stimulation — Reaction Time/physiology — Recognition (Psychology)/physiology — Retention (Psychology)/physiology|
|Research groups||Affective sciences|
Unité de psychopathologie et neuropsychologie cognitive (UPNC)
|WILLEMS, Sylvie, DEDONDER, Jonathan, VAN DER LINDEN, Martial. The Mere Exposure Effect and Recognition Depend on the Way You Look!. In: Experimental Psychology, 2010, vol. 57, n° 3, p. 185-192. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:29418|