UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:28000  next document
add to browser collection

Preferences or blocs? Voting in the United Nations Human Rights Council

Lukacs, Richard
Published in Review of International Organizations. 2014, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 83-106
Abstract After four years in operation the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) is subject to criticism, and various scholars and practitioners alike present and discuss reform proposals. In the present paper we study systematically the controversial decisions in the UNHRC. We find that controversial proposals are introduced by countries with a blemished human rights record, and that in the votes on these proposals the council members belonging to the European Union (EU) vote very distinctly from the remaining members and have preferences quite different from those member states that violate human rights. Extending an empirical approach frequently used in parliamentary research we can also show that in votes in the UNHRC preferences of member states dominate over their membership to particular blocs. As controversial votes also heavily polarize the UNHRC we argue that the problems faced by the UNHRC's predecessor, namely the Commission on Human Rights, have reappeared.
Keywords International organizationHuman rightsVoting
Full text
FNS: 100012-129737
(ISO format)
HUG, Simon, LUKACS, Richard. Preferences or blocs? Voting in the United Nations Human Rights Council. In: Review of International Organizations, 2014, vol. 9, n° 1, p. 83-106. doi: 10.1007/s11558-013-9172-2 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:28000

734 hits



Deposited on : 2013-05-28

Export document
Format :
Citation style :