UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:27939  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Revisionsraten in Journalpublikationen zu Gelenkimplantaten mit auffallig hohen Versagensraten in Registerdatensatzen

Authors
Labek, G
Todorov, S
Haderer, B
Krivanek, S
Published in Der Orthopäde. 2012, vol. 41, no. 10, p. 853-9
Abstract The value of outcome quality data from clinical studies is an issue of controversial debate particularly in the context of adverse events. The aim of this study is to present and evaluate the data available from clinical studies for products that show inferior outcome in registers and to assess the possibility to draw valid conclusions from these data. Study desgin and analytical methods: Based on a structured literature research, a comparative analysis was made of the revision rates of 12 products showing significantly inferior average results in registers. The primary outcome parameter was the revision rate for any reason calculated using a standardized methodology and the parameter of revisions per 100 observed component years.
Keywords Evidence-Based MedicineHumansIncidenceJoint Prosthesis/statistics & numerical dataPeriodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical dataProsthesis FailureRegistries/statistics & numerical dataReoperation/statistics & numerical data
Identifiers
PMID: 22914916
Full text
Article (Published version) (436 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Structures
Research group Chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique (98)
Citation
(ISO format)
LABEK, G et al. Revisionsraten in Journalpublikationen zu Gelenkimplantaten mit auffallig hohen Versagensraten in Registerdatensatzen. In: Der Orthopäde, 2012, vol. 41, n° 10, p. 853-9. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:27939

217 hits

0 download

Update

Deposited on : 2013-05-21

Export document
Format :
Citation style :