en
Scientific article
German

Revisionsraten in Journalpublikationen zu Gelenkimplantaten mit auffallig hohen Versagensraten in Registerdatensatzen

Published inDer Orthopäde, vol. 41, no. 10, p. 853-859
Publication date2012
Abstract

The value of outcome quality data from clinical studies is an issue of controversial debate particularly in the context of adverse events. The aim of this study is to present and evaluate the data available from clinical studies for products that show inferior outcome in registers and to assess the possibility to draw valid conclusions from these data. Study desgin and analytical methods: Based on a structured literature research, a comparative analysis was made of the revision rates of 12 products showing significantly inferior average results in registers. The primary outcome parameter was the revision rate for any reason calculated using a standardized methodology and the parameter of revisions per 100 observed component years.

Keywords
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Joint Prosthesis/statistics & numerical data
  • Periodicals as Topic/statistics & numerical data
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Registries/statistics & numerical data
  • Reoperation/statistics & numerical data
Citation (ISO format)
LABEK, G et al. Revisionsraten in Journalpublikationen zu Gelenkimplantaten mit auffallig hohen Versagensraten in Registerdatensatzen. In: Der Orthopäde, 2012, vol. 41, n° 10, p. 853–859. doi: 10.1007/s00132-012-1945-4
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
ISSN of the journal0085-4530
520views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation05/16/2013 2:46:00 PM
First validation05/16/2013 2:46:00 PM
Update time03/14/2023 8:11:20 PM
Status update03/14/2023 8:11:20 PM
Last indexation01/16/2024 1:40:08 AM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack