UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:26520  next document
add to browser collection

Clinical validation of a new thermodilution system for the assessment of cardiac output and volumetric parameters

Kiefer, Nicholas
Hofer, Christoph K
Marx, Gernot
Geisen, Martin
Hoeft, Andreas
show hidden authors show all authors [1 - 9]
Published in Critical Care. 2012, vol. 16, no. 3, p. R98
Abstract ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Transpulmonary thermodilution is used to measure cardiac output (CO), global end-diastolic volume (GEDV) and extravascular lung water (EVLW). A system has been introduced (VolumeView/EV1000™ system, Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine CA, USA) that employs a novel algorithm for the mathematical analysis of the thermodilution curve. Our aim was to evaluate the agreement of this method with the established PiCCO™ method (Pulsion Medical Systems SE, Munich, Germany, clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01405040) METHODS: Seventy-two critically ill patients with clinical indication for advanced hemodynamic monitoring were included in this prospective, multicenter, observational study. During a 72-hour observation period, 443 sets of thermodilution measurements were performed with the new system. These measurements were electronically recorded, converted into an analog resistance signal and then re-analyzed by a PiCCO2™ device (Pulsion Medical Systems SE). RESULTS: For CO, GEDV, and EVLW, the systems showed a high correlation (r2 = 0.981, 0.926 and 0.971, respectively), minimal bias (0.2 L/minute, 29.4 ml and 36.8 ml), and a low percentage error (9.7%, 11.5% and 12.2%). Changes in CO, GEDV and EVLW were tracked with a high concordance between the two systems, with a traditional concordance for CO, GEDV, and EVLW of 98.5%, 95.1%, and 97.7% and a polar plot concordance of 100%, 99.8% and 99.8% for CO, GEDV, and EVLW, respectively. Radial limits of agreement for CO, GEDV and EVLW were 0.31 ml/minute, 81 ml and 40 ml, respectively. The precision of GEDV measurements was significantly better using the VolumeView™ algorithm compared to the PiCCO™ algorithm (0.033 (0.03) versus 0.040 (0.03; median (interquartile range), P = 0.000049). CONCLUSIONS: For CO, GEDV, and EVLW, the agreement of both the individual measurements as well as measurements of change showed the interchangeability of the two methods. For the VolumeView method, the higher precision may indicate a more robust GEDV algorithm. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov NCT01405040.
PMID: 22647561
Full text
Article (Published version) (975 Kb) - public document Free access
Research group Groupe de Recherche en Hémodynamique (913)
(ISO format)
KIEFER, Nicholas et al. Clinical validation of a new thermodilution system for the assessment of cardiac output and volumetric parameters. In: Critical Care, 2012, vol. 16, n° 3, p. R98. doi: 10.1186/cc11366 https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:26520

377 hits



Deposited on : 2013-03-01

Export document
Format :
Citation style :