UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:26254  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for chest wall syndrome in primary care

Authors
Ronga, Alexandre
Haasenritter, Jörg
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert
Bösner, Stefan
Verdon, François
Bischoff, Thomas
show hidden authors show all authors [1 - 10]
Published in BMC Family Practice. 2012, vol. 13, p. 74
Abstract BACKGROUND: Chest wall syndrome (CWS), the main cause of chest pain in primary care practice, is most often an exclusion diagnosis. We developed and evaluated a clinical prediction rule for CWS. METHODS: Data from a multicenter clinical cohort of consecutive primary care patients with chest pain were used (59 general practitioners, 672 patients). A final diagnosis was determined after 12 months of follow-up. We used the literature and bivariate analyses to identify candidate predictors, and multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a clinical prediction rule for CWS. We used data from a German cohort (n = 1212) for external validation. RESULTS: From bivariate analyses, we identified six variables characterizing CWS: thoracic pain (neither retrosternal nor oppressive), stabbing, well localized pain, no history of coronary heart disease, absence of general practitioner's concern, and pain reproducible by palpation. This last variable accounted for 2 points in the clinical prediction rule, the others for 1 point each; the total score ranged from 0 to 7 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.76-0.83) in the derivation cohort (specificity: 89%; sensitivity: 45%; cut-off set at 6 points). Among all patients presenting CWS (n = 284), 71% (n = 201) had a pain reproducible by palpation and 45% (n = 127) were correctly diagnosed. For a subset (n = 43) of these correctly classified CWS patients, 65 additional investigations (30 electrocardiograms, 16 thoracic radiographies, 10 laboratory tests, eight specialist referrals, one thoracic computed tomography) had been performed to achieve diagnosis. False positives (n = 41) included three patients with stable angina (1.8% of all positives). External validation revealed the ROC curve to be 0.76 (95% confidence interval 0.73-0.79) with a sensitivity of 22% and a specificity of 93%. CONCLUSIONS: This CWS score offers a useful complement to the usual CWS exclusion diagnosing process. Indeed, for the 127 patients presenting CWS and correctly classified by our clinical prediction rule, 65 additional tests and exams could have been avoided. However, the reproduction of chest pain by palpation, the most important characteristic to diagnose CWS, is not pathognomonic.
Identifiers
PMID: 22866824
Full text
Article (Published version) (271 Kb) - public document Free access
Structures
Research group Groupe Mangin Patrice (médecine légale) (862)
Citation
(ISO format)
RONGA, Alexandre et al. Development and validation of a clinical prediction rule for chest wall syndrome in primary care. In: BMC Family Practice, 2012, vol. 13, p. 74. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:26254

296 hits

695 downloads

Update

Deposited on : 2013-02-06

Export document
Format :
Citation style :