Le suffrage universel est-il injuste?
|Published in||Studia Philosophica. 2012, vol. 71, p. 165-186|
|Abstract||Jason Brennan recently argued that universal suffrage is unjust. It gives everyone a say in the collective decision procedure. But not everyone is competent – for we know that voters are often ignorant, irrational, and morally unreasonable. Universal suffrage thus violates what Brennan names the Competence Principle: it is unjust to impose coercitive decisions on innocent people when these decisions are incompetent. Brennan therefore claims that we have a «right to a competent electorate». After having presented Brennan's argument in more detail, the paper adresses one critical question: can an electorate be considered as a collective intentional agent? If not, an electorate cannot have duties. And if it cannot have duties, there is no sensible way to understand Brennan's purported «right to a competent electorate». What is left of Brennan's position is thus rather banal: it is regrettable that some voters are incompetent. And nothing compels us to abandon universal suffrage.|
|Keywords||Démocratie — Vote — Elitisme — Intentionnalité collective — Ethique — Ontologie sociale|
This document has no fulltext available yet, but you can contact its author by using the form below.
Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de santé et de médecine communautaires
|Research group||Ethique biomédicale (783)|
|TAVAGLIONE, Nicolas. Le suffrage universel est-il injuste?. In: Studia Philosophica, 2012, vol. 71, p. 165-186. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:25961|