Scientific article
French

L'Humanité se dit de multiples manières

Contributors

Baertschi, Bernard

Published in

Journal international de bioéthique, vol. 22, no. 3-4, p. 67-76

Publication date

2011

Abstract

The recent debates on human enhancement ask the question whether enhancing our capabilities is morally desirable. In a sense, the answer is straightforward: to enhance, that is to make things better, is, by definition, a good thing. However, to enhance has a special meaning in the present debates: it consists in going beyond our “natural” capabilities. Is it then still a good thing? To answer this question, it is necessary to ask what is the value of the goods we pursue trough enhancement, and this is only possible in the context of a conception of human flourishing. There exist several conceptions of human flourishing; each demands that we improve ourselves in certain directions, depending on the various excellences and on the ideal of the person they promote. But are all means permissible to this effect? Of course not. A set of normative principles are suggested in order to determine which means are permissible. The result of this is that technological and biotechnological means raise no particular problem.

Keywords

  • Amélioration, conception de la vie bonne, biens finaux et biens instrumentaux, respect de l'humanité

UNIGE research groups

Citation (ISO format)

BAERTSCHI, Bernard. L’Humanité se dit de multiples manières. In: Journal international de bioéthique, 2011, vol. 22, n° 3-4, p. 67–76. doi: 10.3917/jib.222.0067

Main files (1)

Article (Published version)

Identifiers

Journal ISSN

1287-7352
771views
2downloads

Technical informations

Creation

13/11/2012 15:15:00

First validation

13/11/2012 15:15:00

Update

14/03/2023 19:59:57

Status update

14/03/2023 19:59:57

Last indexation

30/10/2024 08:37:51
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of Geneva
OpenAIRE Indexed & Validated