Scientific article
Meta-analysis
English

Partially hydrolysed 100% whey-based infant formula and the prevention of atopic dermatitis: comparative pharmacoeconomic analyses

Published inAnnals of nutrition & metabolism, vol. 59 Suppl 1, p. 44-52
Publication date2011
Abstract

Clinical trials have demonstrated that the risk of developing atopic dermatitis is reduced when using hydrolysed formulas to feed infants with a documented risk of atopy (i.e. an affected parent and/or sibling)when breastfeeding is not practised. However, little is known about the cost-effectiveness of using hydrolysed formulas. Consequently, economic analyses in 5 European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Spain and Switzerland) have evaluated the costs and cost-effectiveness of a specific brand of 100% whey-based partially hydrolysed infant formula, NAN-HA® (PHF-W) compared with a cow's milk standard formula (SF) in the prevention of atopic dermatitis in at-risk children. This review synthesises the findings of these studies. Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) used a decision-analytic model to determine treatment pathways, resource utilisation and costs associated with the management of atopic dermatitis in healthy at-risk newborns who were not exclusively breastfed. The model had a 12-month horizon and applied reimbursement rates of 60-100% depending on the country. Outcomes were considered from the perspective of the public healthcare system (e.g. the Ministry of Health; MOH), family and society. The final outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per avoided case of atopic dermatitis (ICER) for PHF-W versus SF. A cost-minimisation analysis was also performed to compare PHF-W with extensively hydrolysed formulas (EHF). The base-case CEA produced ICERs per avoided case for PHF-W versus SF of EUR 982-1,343 (MOH perspective), EUR -2,202 to -624 (family perspective) indicating savings, and EUR -1,220 to 719 from the societal perspective. The main costs related to formula (MOH and society) and time loss (family). In the cost-minimisation analysis, PHF-W yielded savings of between EUR 4.3 and 120 million compared with EHF-whey when the latter was used in prevention. In conclusion, PHF-W was cost-effective versus SF in the prevention of atopic dermatitis and cost saving compared with EHF when used in prevention.

Keywords
  • Cost Savings
  • Dermatitis, Atopic/economics/epidemiology/immunology/prevention & control
  • Europe/epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Hydrolysis
  • Infant
  • Infant Formula/chemistry/economics
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Milk Proteins/administration & dosage/economics
  • Protein Hydrolysates/administration & dosage
  • Risk Factors
Citation (ISO format)
SPIELDENNER, Jörg et al. Partially hydrolysed 100% whey-based infant formula and the prevention of atopic dermatitis: comparative pharmacoeconomic analyses. In: Annals of nutrition & metabolism, 2011, vol. 59 Suppl 1, p. 44–52. doi: 10.1159/000334232
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0250-6807
645views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation19/12/2012 10:53:00
First validation19/12/2012 10:53:00
Update14/03/2023 19:56:29
Status update14/03/2023 19:56:29
Last indexation30/10/2024 08:24:30
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack