Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures

Stern, Richard; Luebbeke-Wolff, Anne; Suva, Domizio; Miozzari, Hermès Howard; Hoffmeyer, Pierre

doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1232-8

Scientific article

Meta-analysis

English

Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures

ContributorsStern, Richard; Luebbeke-Wolff, Anne; Suva, Domizio; Miozzari, Hermès Howard

; Hoffmeyer, Pierre

Published inInternational orthopaedics, vol. 35, no. 12, p. 1855-1861

Collection

Open Access - Licence nationale Springer

Publication date2011

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare femoral head placement, rates of reoperation and cephalic implant cut-out of a screw versus a blade for patients over age 60 with low energy trochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1, A2, and A3) treated either with sliding hip screw or cephalomedullary nail.

Keywords

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Nails
Bone Screws
Female
Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation/methods
Hip Fractures/radiography/surgery
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Osteoporotic Fractures/radiography/surgery
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Failure
Recovery of Function

Affiliation entities

Faculté de médecine / Section de médecine clinique / Département de chirurgie

Research groups

Chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique (98)

Citation (ISO format)

STERN, Richard et al. Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures. In: International orthopaedics, 2011, vol. 35, n° 12, p. 1855–1861. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1232-8

Article (Published version)

Identifiers

PID : unige:24917
DOI : 10.1007/s00264-011-1232-8
PMID : 21387175

Journal ISSN0341-2695

674views

484downloads

Creation03/12/2012 17:09:00

First validation03/12/2012 17:09:00

Update14/03/2023 17:48:55

Status update14/03/2023 17:48:54

Last indexation30/10/2024 08:10:57

Archive ouverte UNIGE

Prospective randomised study comparing screw versus helical blade in the treatment of low-energy trochanteric fractures

The purpose of this study was to compare femoral head placement, rates of reoperation and cephalic implant cut-out of a screw versus a blade for patients over age 60 with low energy trochanteric fractures (AO/OTA 31-A1, A2, and A3) treated either with sliding hip screw or cephalomedullary nail.

Technical informations