Scientific article
Letter
English

Why do we yawn? The importance of evidence for specific yawn-induced effects

Published inNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, vol. 35, no. 5, p. 1302-1304
Publication date2011
Abstract

Gallup (this issue) believes that our recent review on the function of yawning (Guggisberg et al., 2010) is unbalanced and that it ignores evidence for his thermoregulation hypothesis. Here we address these criticisms and show them to be untenable. While we never claimed that the social hypothesis of yawning has "definite experimental support", we emphasize the importance of experimental evidence for specific effects of yawns when considering why we yawn. The only specific effect of yawning that could be demonstrated so far is its contagiousness in humans, some non-human primates, and possibly dogs, whereas all studies investigating physiological consequences of yawns were unable to observe specific yawn-induced effects in the individual of any species. The argument that from an evolutionary perspective, yawns must have a "primitive" physiological function arises from imprecise reasoning.

Keywords
  • Animals
  • Dogs
  • Humans
  • Imitative Behavior/physiology
  • Social Behavior
  • Yawning/physiology
Citation (ISO format)
GUGGISBERG, Adrian et al. Why do we yawn? The importance of evidence for specific yawn-induced effects. In: Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2011, vol. 35, n° 5, p. 1302–1304. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.12.004
Main files (2)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Article (Accepted version)
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0149-7634
660views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation12/10/2012 16:01:00
First validation12/10/2012 16:01:00
Update time21/10/2024 15:00:24
Status update14/03/2023 18:48:06
Last indexation30/10/2024 09:07:05
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack