UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:24353  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Qualitative Comparative Analysis: How inductive use and measurement error lead to problematic inference

Author
Published in Political Analysis. 2013, vol. 21, no. 2, p. 252-265
Abstract An increasing number of analyses in various subfields of political science employ boolean algebra as proposed in Ragin's (1987) qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). This type of analysis is perfectly justifiable if the goal is to test deterministic hypotheses under the assumption of error-free measures of the employed variables. My contention is, however, that only in a very few research areas are our theories sufficiently advanced to yield deterministic hypotheses. Also, given the nature of our objects of study, error-free measures are largely an illusion. Hence, it is unsurprising that many studies employ QCA inductively and gloss over possible measurement errors. In this paper I address these issues and demonstrate the consequences of these problems with simple empirical examples. In an analysis similar to Monte Carlo simulation I show that using boolean algebra in an exploratory fashion without considering possible measurement errors may lead to dramatically misleading inferences. I then suggest remedies that help researchers to circumvent some of these pitfalls.
Keywords QCAInférenceMéthodes
Identifiers
Full text
Article (Preprint) (190 Kb) - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Structures
Citation
(ISO format)
HUG, Simon. Qualitative Comparative Analysis: How inductive use and measurement error lead to problematic inference. In: Political Analysis, 2013, vol. 21, n° 2, p. 252-265. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:24353

369 hits

26 downloads

Update

Deposited on : 2012-12-09

Export document
Format :
Citation style :