UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:23055  next document
add to browser collection

Privacy and Democracy: What the Secret Ballot Reveals

Published in Law, Culture and Humanities. 2012, vol. autumn
Abstract Does the rejection of pure proceduralism show that we should adopt Brettschneider's value theory of democracy? The answer, this paper suggests, is ‘no'. There are a potentially infinite number of incompatible ways to understand democracy, of which the value theory is, at best, only one. The paper illustrates and substantiates its claims by looking at what the secret ballot shows us about the importance of privacy and democracy. Drawing on the reasons to reject Mill's arguments for open voting, in a previous paper by A. Lever, it argues that people's claims to privacy have a constitutive, as well as an instrumental, importance to democratic government, which is best seen by attending to democracy as a practice, and not merely as a distinctive set of values.
Keywords PrivacyEqualityDemocracySecret BallotRightsCorey BrettschneiderProceduralism
Note This is part of a mini-Symposium on Corey Brettschneider's book, Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government
Full text
(ISO format)
LEVER, Annabelle. Privacy and Democracy: What the Secret Ballot Reveals. In: Law, Culture and Humanities, 2012, vol. autumn. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:23055

815 hits



Deposited on : 2012-09-27

Export document
Format :
Citation style :