UNIGE document Scientific Article
previous document  unige:19792  next document
add to browser collection
Title

Assessment of hepatic steatosis by expert pathologists: the end of a gold standard

Authors
El-Badry, Ashraf Mohammad
Breitenstein, Stefan
Jochum, Wolfram
Washington, Kay
Paradis, Valérie
Puhan, Milo A.
Slankamenac, Ksenija
show hidden authors show all authors [1 - 10]
Published in Annals of Surgery. 2009, vol. 250, no. 5, p. 691-697
Abstract BACKGROUND: The presence of fat in the liver is considered a major risk for postoperative complication after liver surgery and transplantation. The current standard of quantification of hepatic steatosis is microscopic evaluation by pathologists, although consistency in such assessment remains unclear. Computerized image analysis is an alternative method for objective assessment of the degree of hepatic steatosis. METHODS: High resolution images of hematoxylin and eosin stained liver sections from 46 consecutive patients, initially diagnosed with liver steatosis, were blindly assessed by 4 established expert pathologists from different institutions. Computerized analysis was carried out simultaneously on the same sections. Interobserver agreement and correlation between the pathologists' and computerized assessment were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), Spearman rank correlation coefficients, or descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Poor agreement among pathologists (ICC: 0.57) was found regarding the assessment of total steatosis, (ICC >0.7 indicates acceptable agreement). Pathologists' estimation of micro- and macrosteatosis disclosed also poor correlation (ICC: 0.22, 0.55, respectively). Inconsistent assessment of histological features of steatohepatitis (lobular inflammation, portal inflammation, hepatocyte ballooning, and Mallory hyaline) was documented. Poor conformity was also shown between the computerized quantification and ratings of 3 pathologists (Spearman rank correlation coefficients: 0.22, 0.82, 0.28, and 0.38). CONCLUSION: Quantification of hepatic steatosis in histological sections is strongly observer-dependent, not reproducible, and does not correlate with the computerized estimation. Current standards of assessment, previously published data and the clinical relevance of hepatic steatosis for liver surgery and transplantation must be challenged.
Keywords AdultAgedAged, 80 and overColoring AgentsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFatty Liver/*pathologyFemaleHepatocytes/metabolism/pathologyHistological TechniquesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLipids/analysisLiver/*pathologyMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPathology, Clinical
Identifiers
PMID: 19806055
Full text
Article - document accessible for UNIGE members only Limited access to UNIGE
Structures
Research group Métastases du foie (657)
Citation
(ISO format)
EL-BADRY, Ashraf Mohammad et al. Assessment of hepatic steatosis by expert pathologists: the end of a gold standard. In: Annals of Surgery, 2009, vol. 250, n° 5, p. 691-697. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:19792

218 hits

1 download

Update

Deposited on : 2012-04-23

Export document
Format :
Citation style :