Scientific article
Open access

Compulsory Voting: A Critical Perspective

ContributorsLever, Annabelle
Published inBritish journal of political science, vol. 40, no. 14, p. 897-915
Publication date2010

Compulsory voting is sometimes thought to be justified in democracies because it promotes high levels of voting and mitigates inequalities of turnout amongst social groups. Proponents of compulsory voting also argue that it helps to prevent the free-riding of non-voters on voters. This article casts a sceptical eye on both arguments. Democratic citizens do not have a duty to promote their self-interest,and their duties to others do not generally require them to vote, or to attend the polls. So, while people are sometimes morally obliged to vote, and to vote one way rather than another, legal compulsion to vote or to turn out is generally unjustified and inconsistent with democratic government.

  • Right to vote
  • Duty to vote
  • Legitimacy
  • Democracy
  • Equality
  • Liberty
  • Compulsory voting
  • Compulsory turnout
  • Free riding
Citation (ISO format)
LEVER, Annabelle. Compulsory Voting: A Critical Perspective. In: British journal of political science, 2010, vol. 40, n° 14, p. 897–915.
Main files (1)
Article (Accepted version)
  • PID : unige:19449
ISSN of the journal0007-1234

Technical informations

Creation04/13/2012 12:36:00 AM
First validation04/13/2012 12:36:00 AM
Update time03/14/2023 5:22:35 PM
Status update03/14/2023 5:22:35 PM
Last indexation10/18/2023 1:40:54 PM
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack