Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Antigen rapid tests, nasopharyngeal PCR and saliva PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2: A prospective comparative clinical trial

Published inPloS one, vol. 18, no. 2, e0282150
Publication date2023-02-24
First online date2023-02-24
Abstract

Background: Nasopharyngeal antigen Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs), saliva RT-PCR and nasopharyngeal (NP) RT-PCR have shown different performance characteristics to detect patients infected by SARS-CoV-2, according to the viral load (VL)-and thus transmissibility.

Methods: In October 2020, we conducted a prospective trial involving patients presenting at testing centres with symptoms of COVID-19. We compared detection rates and performance of RDT, saliva PCR and nasopharyngeal (NP) PCR, according to VL and symptoms duration.

Results: Out of 949 patients enrolled, 928 patients had all three tests performed. Detection rates were 35.2% (95%CI 32.2-38.4%) by RDT, 39.8% (36.6-43.0%) by saliva PCR, 40.1% (36.9-43.3%) by NP PCR, and 41.5% (38.3-44.7%) by any test. For those with viral loads (VL) ≥106 copies/ml, detection rates were 30.3% (27.3-33.3), 31.4% (28.4-34.5), 31.5% (28.5-34.6), and 31.6% (28.6-34.7%) respectively. Sensitivity of RDT compared to NP PCR was 87.4% (83.6-90.6%) for all positive patients, 94.5% (91.5-96.7%) for those with VL≥105 and 96.5% (93.6-98.3%) for those with VL≥106. Sensitivity of STANDARD-Q®, Panbio™ and COVID-VIRO® Ag tests were 92.9% (86.4-96.9%), 86.1% (78.6-91.7%) and 84.1% (76.9-89.7%), respectively. For those with VL≥106, sensitivity was 96.6% (90.5-99.3%), 97.8% (92.1-99.7%) and 95.3% (89.4-98.5%) respectively. No patient with VL<104 was detected by RDT. Specificity of RDT was 100% (99.3-100%) compared to any PCR. RDT sensitivity was similar <4 days (87.8%, 83.5-91.3%) and ≥4 days (85.7%, 75.9-92.6%) after symptoms onset (p = 0.6). Sensitivity of saliva and NP PCR were 95.7% (93.1-97.5%) and 96.5% (94.1-98.1%), respectively, compared to the other PCR.

Conclusions: RDT results allow rapid identification of COVID cases with immediate isolation of most contagious individuals. RDT can thus be a game changer both in ambulatory care and community testing aimed at stopping transmission chains, and even more so in resource-constrained settings thanks to its very low price. When PCR is performed, saliva could replace NP swabbing.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04613310 (03/11/2020).

Affiliation entities Not a UNIGE publication
Citation (ISO format)
SCHWOB, Jean-Marc et al. Antigen rapid tests, nasopharyngeal PCR and saliva PCR to detect SARS-CoV-2: A prospective comparative clinical trial. In: PloS one, 2023, vol. 18, n° 2, p. e0282150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282150
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (4)
Appendix - Clinical Study Protocol
accessLevelPublic
Appendix - STROBE Statement Checklist
accessLevelPublic
Appendix - TREND Statement Checklist
accessLevelPublic
Show more
Identifiers
Additional URL for this publicationhttps://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282150
Journal ISSN1932-6203
5views
10downloads

Technical informations

Creation26/02/2023 12:25:43
First validation15/05/2026 08:45:49
Update21/05/2026 12:49:50
Status update21/05/2026 12:49:50
Last indexation21/05/2026 12:49:52
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack