Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in thoracic cancer surgery : A comparative study between calibrated pulse contour analysis and chest bioreactance

Publication date2022-08
First online date2022-09-15
Abstract

Background: Patients scheduled for thoracic cancer surgery are eligible for goal-directed fluid therapy, but cardiac output monitoring remains challenging in that specific setting.

Objective: We aimed to compare cardiac output as measured with chest bioreactance with that measured by calibrated pulse contour analysis; the hypothesis being that both methods would be interchangeable.

Design: A prospective monocentre observational study.

Setting: A tertiary university hospital.

Patients: Fifty adult patients undergoing thoracic cancer surgery over a one year period.

Main outcome measures: Simultaneous measurements of cardiac index (CI) with bioreactance (CI-NICOM) and arterial pulse contour analysis calibrated by transthoracic echocardiography (CI-PCA) were performed at eight pre-specified intra-operative time points and following fluid challenge and/or vasoactive agents. Relationships between absolute values and changes in CI were assessed by linear regression. Interchangeability was tested with Bland-Altman analysis and percentage error calculation. A four quadrant plot was used to evaluate trending ability.

Results: There was a significant difference between CI-PCA and CI-NICOM: 2.4 ± 0.8 (range: 0.9 to 5.8) l min-1  m-2 vs. 2.9 ± 0.9 (range: 0.9 to 7.2) l min-1  m-2 , respectively (P  < 0.001). A positive relationship was found between both techniques: y = 0.29x + 2.19; r 2  = 0.08 (P  < 0.001). Taking CI-PCA as the reference method, there was a systematic overestimation of CI-NICOM by 21% (0.5 l min-1  m-2 ) and limits of agreement were large: -2.49 to 1.47 l min-1  m-2 . The percentage error was 77% and concordance rates were 75 and 70% with and without an exclusion zone of 0.5 l min-1  m-2 .

Conclusion: Chest bioreactance is feasible and well tolerated in patients undergoing thoracic surgery for cancer. When compared with calibrated PCA over a wide range of CI values, the technique is moderately correlated, not interchangeable, and provides moderate trending ability.

Trial registration: NCT04251637.

Citation (ISO format)
FELLAHI, Jean-Luc et al. Non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in thoracic cancer surgery : A comparative study between calibrated pulse contour analysis and chest bioreactance. In: European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care, 2022, vol. 1, n° 4, p. e006. doi: 10.1097/EA9.0000000000000006
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (2)
Appendix
accessLevelPublic
Appendix
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
Journal ISSN2767-7206
3views
32downloads

Technical informations

Creation21/04/2026 16:00:21
First validation29/04/2026 09:01:14
Update29/04/2026 09:01:14
Status update29/04/2026 09:01:14
Last indexation29/04/2026 09:01:16
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack