Scientific article
OA Policy
English

Exploring Electoral Discrimination through an Ethics of Office Accountability

Published in

Representation

First online date

2025-06-19

Abstract

Electoral discrimination (ED) in democratic settings occurs when majority voters, influenced by their personal, cultural, or religious biases, favour majority candidates, consequently diminishing support for minority candidates. We discuss ED’s alignment with a normative ethics of voting grounded in office accountability, asking whether ED is compatible with the democratic mandate of voters. Our normative discussion shows that ED is compatible with the open terms of a voter’s mandate. We recognise, however, that there are empirically grounded reasons not to overlook the negative repercussions of ED for minority candidates’ political participation. We address these concerns by exploring how institutional design could mitigate the negative outcomes of ED, fostering critical reflection on the democratic electoral process

Keywords

  • Democratic studies
  • Democracy
  • Elections
  • Discrimination
  • Electoral discrimination
  • Ethics of voting
  • Accountability<

Citation (ISO format)

CEVA, Emanuela, STOJANOVIC, Nenad. Exploring Electoral Discrimination through an Ethics of Office Accountability. In: Representation, 2025. doi: 10.1080/00344893.2025.2515587

Main files (1)

Article (Published version)

Identifiers

Journal ISSN

0034-4893
22views
141downloads

Technical informations

Creation

09/06/2025 11:52:42

First validation

16/01/2026 11:53:15

Update

16/01/2026 11:53:15

Status update

16/01/2026 11:53:15

Last indexation

16/01/2026 11:53:16
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of Geneva
OpenAIRE Indexed & Validated