Scientific article
English

Anticoagulation Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 : A Systematic Review and Prospective Meta-analysis

Errata
  • The Acknowledgment section has been revised to include disclosures of funding support for Claire L. Vale, Peter J. Godolphin, David J. Fisher, Julian P.T. Higgins, Francesca Spiga, Jonathan A.C. Sterne, and Srinivas Murthy.
  • DOI : 10.7326/annals-25-00916
  • PMID : 40096698
Published inAnnals of internal medicine, vol. 178, no. 1, p. 59-69
Publication date2025-01
First online date2024-12-24
Abstract

Background: Reported results of clinical trials assessing higher-dose anticoagulation in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 have been inconsistent.

Purpose: To estimate the association of higher- versus lower-dose anticoagulation with clinical outcomes.

Data sources: Randomized trials were identified from the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and ClinicalTrials.gov with no restriction by trial status or language.

Study selection: Eligible randomized trials assigned patients hospitalized for COVID-19 to higher- versus lower-dose anticoagulation.

Data extraction: 20 eligible trials provided data in a prospectively agreed format. Two further studies were included based on published data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality 28 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes were progression to invasive mechanical ventilation or death, thromboembolic events, and major bleeding.

Data synthesis: Therapeutic- compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation with heparins reduced 28-day mortality (OR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93]; I 2  = 29%; 11 trials, 6297 patients, of whom 5456 required low or no oxygen at randomization). The ORs for 28-day mortality were 1.21 (CI, 0.93 to 1.58; I 2  = 0%) for therapeutic-dose compared with intermediate-dose anticoagulation (6 trials, 1803 patients, 843 receiving noninvasive ventilation at randomization) and 0.95 (CI, 0.76 to 1.19; I 2  = 0%; 10 trials, 3897 patients, 2935 receiving no or low oxygen at randomization) for intermediate- versus prophylactic-dose anticoagulation. Treatment effects appeared broadly consistent across predefined patient subgroups, although some analyses were limited in power. Higher- compared with lower-dose anticoagulation was associated with fewer thromboembolic events, but a greater risk for major bleeding.

Conclusion: Therapeutic-dose compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation reduced 28-day mortality. Mortality was similar for intermediate-dose compared with prophylactic-dose anticoagulation and higher for therapeutic-dose compared with intermediate-dose anticoagulation, although this comparison was not estimated precisely.

Primary funding source: No direct funding. (PROSPERO: CRD42020213461).

Keywords
  • Humans
  • Anticoagulants / administration & dosage
  • Anticoagulants / adverse effects
  • Anticoagulants / therapeutic use
  • COVID-19 / mortality
  • Hospitalization
  • COVID-19 Drug Treatment
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced
  • Thromboembolism / prevention & control
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Heparin / administration & dosage
  • Heparin / adverse effects
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Respiration, Artificial
Citation (ISO format)
VALE, Claire L et al. Anticoagulation Among Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 : A Systematic Review and Prospective Meta-analysis. In: Annals of internal medicine, 2025, vol. 178, n° 1, p. 59–69. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-00800
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
accessLevelRestricted
Updates (1)
Erratum
accessLevelRestricted
Identifiers
Journal ISSN0003-4819
10views
0downloads

Technical informations

Creation04/12/2025 14:33:42
First validation13/01/2026 14:41:19
Update09/02/2026 14:36:48
Status update09/02/2026 14:36:48
Last indexation09/02/2026 14:45:51
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack