Scientific article
OA Policy
English

β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infection

CollaboratorsBuetti, Niccolo
Published inJAMA network open, vol. 8, no. 10, e2540809
Publication date2025-10-01
First online date2025-10-01
Abstract

Importance: β-lactam-based surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is the standard for most surgical procedures. Alternatively, and mostly due to allergies, non-β-lactam-based prophylaxis is used. The association between the use of non-β-lactam SAP and an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI) rate has not yet been conclusively described.

Objective: To assess whether non-β-lactam vs β-lactam prophylaxis is associated with the occurrence of SSI.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study was based on the Swissnoso SSI surveillance system of 175 hospitals, including adult patients who underwent a major surgical procedure with SAP administration within 120 minutes prior to incision and postdischarge follow-up from January 2009 to December 2020. Patients with wound contamination class IV were excluded. Data analysis was conducted from July to December 2024.

Exposures: β-Lactam SAP vs non-β-lactam SAP.

Main outcomes and measures: The main outcome was occurrence of SSI, according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. Mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to adjust for institutional, patient, and perioperative confounding factors.

Results: Of 538 976 surveilled patients, 348 885 (196 411 [56.3%] female; median [IQR] age, 63.2 [47.0-73.3] years) fulfilled eligibility criteria. β-Lactam SAP was administered in 342 936 patients (98.3%) and non-β-lactam SAP in 5949 patients (1.7%). SSI was diagnosed in 9507 patients (2.8%) exposed to β-lactam SAP vs 364 patients (6.1%) who received non-β-lactam SAP (P < .001). Non-β-lactam SAP was significantly associated with a higher SSI rate (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.78; 95% CI, 1.59-1.99; P < .001) compared with β-lactam SAP. A higher SSI rate for non-β-lactam SAP was found across all procedure types. Secondary analyses found a higher risk of SSI for ciprofloxacin (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.33-1.87; P < .001), vancomycin (aOR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.03-1.86; P = .04), and clindamycin (aOR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.82-2.47; P < .001) compared with β-lactam SAP.

Conclusions and relevance: In this large cohort study, administration of non-β-lactam SAP was associated with 1.8-fold higher odds of SSI. These findings suggest that non-β-lactam SAP should be avoided whenever possible. A careful evaluation of patients with reported β-lactam allergy should be performed before administering a second-choice antibiotic.

Keywords
  • Humans
  • Surgical Wound Infection / prevention & control
  • Surgical Wound Infection / epidemiology
  • Female
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis / methods
  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis / statistics & numerical data
  • Beta-Lactams / therapeutic use
  • Aged
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Switzerland / epidemiology
  • Cohort Studies
  • Risk Factors
Citation (ISO format)
LARGIADÈR, Selina et al. β-Lactam vs Non-β-Lactam Antimicrobial Prophylaxis and Surgical Site Infection. In: JAMA network open, 2025, vol. 8, n° 10, p. e2540809. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.40809
Main files (1)
Article (Published version)
Secondary files (3)
Appendix
accessLevelPublic
Appendix
accessLevelPublic
Appendix
accessLevelPublic
Identifiers
Journal ISSN2574-3805
11views
80downloads

Technical informations

Creation04/12/2025 08:32:38
First validation13/01/2026 11:12:57
Update13/01/2026 11:12:57
Status update13/01/2026 11:12:57
Last indexation13/01/2026 11:13:00
All rights reserved by Archive ouverte UNIGE and the University of GenevaunigeBlack